Yeyep is Your Go-to Source for All the Latest Entertainment News, from Movies and TV Shows to Music and Fashion.
⎯ 《 Yeyep • Com 》

'Quit with the filters': Amy Slaton's birthday post for 11-month-old son Glenn slammed for being 'unnatural'

2023-06-10 09:15
Amy Slaton celebrated her son Glenn's 11-month birthday with a heartfelt post
'Quit with the filters': Amy Slaton's birthday post for 11-month-old son Glenn slammed for being 'unnatural'

DIXON, KENTUCKY: '1000-lb Sisters' star Amy Slaton has embarked on a courageous journey, taking on the most formidable role of her life – that of a devoted parent to her two children. Amid the emotional aftermath of her separation from Michael Halterman, with whom she welcomed her sons Gage and Glenn, Amy now finds herself navigating the uncharted waters of single motherhood.

In a poignant and heartfelt gesture, Amy celebrated a significant milestone in her son Glenn's life, marking his 11th month in this world. She took to social media to share a touching birthday post dedicated to her little one. However, it didn't take long for the watchful eyes of her loyal fans to discover an interesting detail in the photo she shared, prompting them to voice their concerns and criticisms.

Amy Slaton posts late birthday message for son Glenn

On Instagram, Amy poured out her heart in a touching message dedicated to her 11-month-old son. Her caption read, "I know I’m late but happy 11mo to my wonderful goofy boy!! Love you soooo much chunky." However, what caught the attention of many was the accompanying photo, where Glenn's adorable face was adorned with a makeup filter. His lashes appeared longer and his complexion had a radiant, ethereal glow. In the photo, Amy lovingly planted a kiss on his tiny head. This choice of filter sparked reactions from her supporters.

'What the heck is with the filter?'

In the comments section, Amy was heavily criticized for using a makeup filter on her baby. One person firmly stated, "Stop putting filters on babies, they don't need them," while another remarked, "I assume there is a filter because she is also in the photo." Some individuals pointed out, "Filters aren't needed on babies. Show his cute natural self." Another comment read, "He's a boy - quit with the filters - he has better lashes than I do in this pic - and I'm sure he probably does naturally anyway- quit the filter b.s - your babies are so happy and healthy and bouncing - no need, girl… no need." Expressing their exasperation, one person questioned, "Why so much filters on all his pictures? Unnatural. Ugh." Another observant commenter added, "No one needs a filter, especially not a baby. No need to question why kids grow up with self-esteem issues."

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

Tags news